Seattle, WA December 13, 2018 Located on the shore of Lake Union, Pure Watercraft set out to redefine boating with their Pure Outboard electric motor. In the process, they developed a battery pack with the highest energy density in marine, matching that of the best electric cars.
The 118 lb battery pack uses industry-leading Panasonic lithium-ion cells and has a capacity of 8.85 kWh. More energy per pound means a boat can get up on plane more easily and stay on plane for longer. Active thermal management leads to longer battery life and the ability to travel greater distances at high speed.
It’s also clean. The Pure Outboard emits no exhaust or noxious fumes, spills no oil or gas into the water, and is whisper quiet. It starts at the touch of a button, is immediately ready to drive, and charges easily via a standard 120V or 240V outlet available in most garages and marinas. Between the savings in fuel costs and the elimination of maintenance costs, a typical outing will cost about one or two dollars in electricity.
“Our team built the outboard motor and battery pack system from the ground up”, says Andy Rebele, founder and CEO of Pure Watercraft. “Throughout the process, each component has been designed to maximize efficiency.”
The current system is set to replace traditional combustion outboards up to 40 horsepower. Range depends on use: a typical aluminum fishing boat equipped with two battery packs could go at a trolling speed of 3 MPH for about 50 hours, or 25 MPH for about an hour. Charge time is as fast as 90 minutes from half to full charge using a 240V outlet.
The quiet speed of the outboard has already caught the attention of anglers seeking a competitive edge. Likewise, elite rowing teams such as Harvard, Yale, Stanford and the University of Washington have pre-ordered the Pure Outboard for their coaches. “We’re eagerly awaiting the Pure Watercraft system because it will transform how we coach our team,” says Michael Callahan, Head Coach of men’s rowing at University of Washington.
Pure Watercraft is starting customer deliveries in January 2019 and is currently accepting $500 pre-order deposits. A system starts at $14,500 for a Pure Outboard motor and one battery pack.
Pure Outboard Battery Pack
Voltage (nominal): 350V
Capacity: 8.85 kWh (multiple packs can be combined for larger capacity)
Cells: 18650 form factor
Weight: 118 lbs
Water Resistance: IP67
Thermal management: Active
Pure Outboard Motor
HP: 40 HP equivalent
Weight: 110 lbs
Water Resistance: IP67
Voltage (nominal): 350V
Prop RPM at peak power: 1500 RPM
Propeller: 16″ diameter 3-blade propeller
Motor: 20 kW continuous power PMAC motor, passively cooled underwater in line with propeller
With Tesla Energyâ€™s announcement about using lithium-ion battery packs for home (the Powerwall), business (Tesla Business Storage), and utilities (Tesla Utility Storage), many are wondering whether this makes sense for them. Should homeowners buy batteries for their homes? Should utilities? Businesses? Itâ€™s complicated, but worth exploring. Since Pure Watercraft is designing systems with large batteries, and the second life of such batteries (after they retire from a boat) is an important factor in their value, the emergence of this market directly affects our business.
For the Homeowner
For the grid-connected individual homeowner in the United States, it would be very difficult for this to make sense, just for buying power at night and using it during the day, without more incentives than just time-of-day pricing. The benefit would have to come from being insulated from power outages, which for some people is quite valuable. But if you use Powerwalls to buy off-peak power and sell it back at peak times, then you may not have the power you need when the power goes out. So youâ€™d have to plan your daily charge/discharge schedule to maintain some emergency power, which would limit your power savings.
A reasonable plan for a PG&E power customer in California would require 5 PowerWalls. It would provide at least a half of a typical dayâ€™s power usage for backup power, and $4,075 in power savings over 10 years, and it would cost about $25,000 installed. If you value the backup power at about $10,000 (the cost of a decent backup generator, installed), then you get $14,075 in value (realized over 10 years) for about $25,000. And PG&E provides among the highest premiums for peak power. If you decided to use them exclusively for emergencies, then youâ€™d still need 5, because otherwise, they couldnâ€™t handle the power output youâ€™d need.
For a home with solar power, there is additional value, but only for backup purposes. Solar is generated during peak hours, so itâ€™s best to sell it to the grid when youâ€™re generating more than youâ€™re using, instead of storing it for later, when you might be able to buy off-peak power. The only additional benefit for solar-equipped homeowners is that during a power outage, they may be able to generate enough solar power during the day to replenish the Powerwalls and survive off-grid indefinitely.
The best application is for the off-grid homeowner, who is already using banks of lead-acid batteries. This would be a longer-life, more reliable, lower-maintenance system than what he or she is using today.
So, is there another way it can make sense? A comment by Elon Musk at the Tesla Energy press conference gives a hint: â€œAll of the Powerwalls and Power Packs are connected to the Internet,” Musk said. “Weâ€™re able to work with utilities to shift power around.” So perhaps Tesla Energy can capture some fees from the utilities for providing on-demand peak shaving (which would hopefully be shared with Powerwall owners). And of course, utility or government incentives to homeowners could tip the scales (though current California incentives for energy storage are focused exclusively on business customers).
(Calculations behind this argument below at the end of the post…for battery geeks only.)
For the Utilities
Utilities think about power differently than homeowners do. They think about the cost of building a new power plant to handle peak demand. Thatâ€™s why many of them provide time-of-day pricing. So when they look at energy storage, theyâ€™re comparing it to the alternative of building a new power plant that only gets used during peak hours.
A typical natural gas power plant costs $1,000 per kW of capacity to build. Tesla Utility Storage costs $250 per kWh, but each kWh can only deliver 200W of continuous power, so it costs about $1,250 per kW of power. And there are installation and other costs on top of the $250 per kWh, so Iâ€™d assume that the total cost to the utility would be $2,000 or greater per kW of capacity added in this way. So, natural gas plants are cheaper to build.
An advantage of a battery solution is response time. They would be a great way to respond quickly to a spike in demand, and to store momentary excess capacity, since even a natural gas turbine takes a few seconds to power up. And the pulse power offered by batteries is nearly double the continuous power. So a few lithium-ion batteries as a layer on top of slower-responding peaker plants might make sense.
This can make sense for some businesses in areas with that offer significant incentives for energy storage, but without them, it won’t make financial sense, so the justification would have to be the principle of improving the environment for green power.
Businesses currently dread â€œdemand chargesâ€, which are fees that they pay for the peak demand they impose on the grid during a 15-minute period. Demand charges can be 30% of a businessâ€™ power bill. A Tesla Energy Pack can reduce the demand charges, and also enable shifting demand into off-peak rates. PG&E customers can combine these benefits for about $4.50 per â€œsummerâ€ month and $1 per â€œwinterâ€ month per kWh installed (to the extent it reduces peak demand). So, spend $500 to install a kWh of capacity, and save $29.40/year in utility bills. Over 10 years, the PG&E business customer gets $294 in savings for $500 up front (assuming the cost to large businesses is about the same as to utilities).
Some utilities may offer better incentives that could make this a good deal. For example, in California, the state offers (through the utilities) $1.46 per Watt for â€œadvanced energy storageâ€. 1 kWh of storage that provides 200W continuous power would get $292, which is about 58% of the installation cost. Combine that with the energy savings, and the California business gets $586 in value for $500.
Is this just a pricing mistake by the utilities? Should we as a society be storing more energy in batteries? Will it enable renewables?
Solar power typically produces power when it is needed most, but itâ€™s vulnerable to bad days or series of days. Even with good energy storage, a primarily solar energy based grid or micro-grid would require an alternative source of energy during long cloudy days.
Wind power is inconsistent in most places, so energy storage may be a good fit for wind power.
Battery based storage may be a good fit for a mix of renewables. Each of them can be bursty, but combined, they are less so, and if solar is a significant part of the mix, then the average production may fit the average demand, and energy storage could cover the discrepancies.
Second Life for Batteries
Right now, Tesla Energy is using a different battery chemistry for energy storage than for Tesla Motorsâ€™ cars (though they say theyâ€™ll both be made at the Gigafactory). But a real boon to this market would be the availability of large numbers of used electric car batteries. Right now, an EV battery is deemed â€œfinishedâ€ when it reaches 80% of its initial capacity, but itâ€™s still a perfectly usable battery. If Tesla can use the battery packs from its cars, as they are replaced, for energy storage, then you can dramatically lower the capital costs of installing such a system, and the refurbishment would be much less expensive than trying to repurpose the cells within a Tesla battery pack for another use (which would require taking 7000 cells out of a battery pack, un-welding them, and assembling them into something else). The downside to a used Tesla pack is that its energy density (the energy to weight ratio) is about 20% less than a new one, but for home storage, that doesn’t matter. The internal resistance is also higher, but the charge and discharge rates of these energy storage packs are low, so that shouldn’t be a significant problem. Creating a secondary market for used EV battery packs could be the biggest benefit of this innovation. (Californiaâ€™s incentive program would have to evolve, since it currently prohibits the incentives for a project that uses refurbished battery packs.)
The Developing World
If youâ€™ve traveled to the developing world, then youâ€™re familiar with the frequent power outages that plague many such countries. Sometimes itâ€™s caused by a failing grid, sometimes by insufficient capacity at the power plant, sometimes inadequate data for management, but in some places, blackouts are a daily or weekly occurrence. A battery based on-site storage system would be a godsend for homeowners and small businesses in such locations, and they would level out demand for the utilities, possibly lowering the frequency of such outages.
Lithium-ion batteries are improving in price/performance by about 7% per year. At this point, lithium ion battery energy storage will make good sense for the developing world, for select homeowners, and for utilities to layer on top of other peak-shaving approaches. As renewable energy sources increase deployment and battery capabilities improve, the applications in which it makes sense will grow larger and larger.
Detailed Calculations – Homeowner (Warning: for battery geeks only)
A reasonable plan for a homeowner attempting to realize value from both peak/off-peak power differences, and emergency backup power, would be to cycle the batteries every day from 50% up to 80% at night and back down to 50% during the day. That way, there would always be half the battery available for emergency power, and the batteries would never be at a cycle-life limiting state of charge of 90% or greater. The annual value from peak/off-peak arbitrage is 30% of 10 kWh * 0.92 (the round-trip efficiency of the Powerwall) * 0.90 (the assumed round-trip efficiency of the inverter) * $0.18 (PG&Eâ€™s difference between peak and off-peak residential summer rates) * 365 (days per year) * 0.50 (because only half the year has such incentives) = $81.50.
Typical backup power generators provide about 10 kW continuous power. A Powerwall provides 2 kW continuous power, so youâ€™d need 5 of them to provide the same power. A typical homeowner uses about 50 kWh in a day, so if a power outage happened when the battery was at half capacity, youâ€™d still have about a half dayâ€™s usage in the battery. Since the lowest battery level would occur at the end of the day, and power usage is low at night, the homeowner would probably have until the middle of the following day before running out of battery power. A power outage at the beginning of the day would give the homeowner until a day later.
So a homeowner who chooses the 5 Powerwalls illustrated above would realize $81.50 per Powerwall x 5 Powerwalls x 10 years = $4,075.
The installed cost of the 5 Powerwalls would be the cost of the Powerwalls themselves ($3,500 * 5 = $17,500) plus about $7,500 for the inverter and system installation, for a total of about $25,000. (The inverter and system installation costs are unknown, so these are educated guesses.)
Note that trying to survive on backup power from a single Powerwall would be a challenge. With 2 kW, youâ€™d be able to power a toaster and microwave operating at the same time, but just barely (and not with many lights on). It would not be enough to operate a clothes dryer.
If you wanted to use the Powerwalls solely to arbitrage peak vs. off-peak power rates, youâ€™d probably charge to 80% state of charge and discharge to 20% every day, which would give you 2190 battery cycles in 10 years. (Using 80% of the battery or more, for example from 90% state of charge down to 10%, would drive 2920 cycles, which is more than the pack could deliver at that depth of discharge.) The value of that arbitrage would be $0.18 (peak rate – off-peak rate) * 2190 cycles * 10 kWh per cycle * 0.92 (Powerwall round trip efficiency) * 0.9 (inverter round trip efficiency) * 0.5 (half year incentives) = $1,632. Youâ€™d be paying $3,500 plus inverter cost plus installation up front – maybe $5,000 total, to get $1,632 in savings over 10 years, per Powerwall. That would be very difficult to justify without more incentives.
Detailed Calculations – Businesses (Warning: for battery geeks only)
PG&E charges about $15 per kW in demand charges during the 6 months of â€œsummerâ€, and about $5 per kW in demand charges during the 6 months of â€œwinterâ€. (Itâ€™s a little more complicated than that, but thatâ€™s the simple version.) Each kWh of capacity delivers 200W of continuous power (190W after subtracting 5% inverter inefficiency), so you get $2.85 in demand charge savings for every kWh installed. The winter savings is â…“ that, or $0.95 per kWh installed.
PG&E power rates are about $0.162 peak and $0.074 off-peak in summer, and $0.102 peak vs. $0.078 off-peak in winter. Using 92% round-trip efficiency of the battery pack, and 90% round-trip efficiency of the inverter, the winter rate difference isnâ€™t worth much. The summer rate difference can be worth something. If you buy an off-peak kWh for $0.162, you sell it back as 0.828 kWh * $0.074/kWh = $0.061 per kWh. So taking 60% of the batteryâ€™s capacity daily, you get a summer value of $2.85 in demand charge reduction plus $1.10 in rate savings (total $3.95) per kWh, and a winter value of $0.95 in demand charge reduction.
At Pure Watercraft, we spend a lot of time thinking about how to get the most out of batteries for electric boats. Along the way, weâ€™ve learned a lot that can also be applied to smaller batteries used in everyday life. All of us have lithium-ion batteries controlling an increasing share of what we do. They power our cellphones, laptops, tablets, fitness bands, and bluetooth headsets. For some, they power lawn mowers, drones, cars, and boats. Yet most people know very little about how to care for the batteries to make them perform their best. Have you ever wondered why your phone doesnâ€™t last a full day any more? Or had to replace a non-replaceable battery in a cellphone or tablet? Caring properly for lithium-ion batteries can maintain their capacity, and extend their lives by 2-3 times.
Here are the top six ways to make them perform their best:
1. Mostly full is a LOT better than fully full
If you only fill a battery to 86%, you double the number of battery cycles. What does that mean? It means you get double the energy out of the battery over its lifetime if you only fill it to that level. (Note: a â€œcycleâ€ means discharging and charging a battery its full capacity one time, not necessarily in one shot, so if you charge and discharge it by 50% of its capacity twice, that counts as one â€œcycleâ€.) Stopping at 90% is better than 100%, and 80% is better than 90%.
2. Donâ€™t leave them full
Keeping a battery fully charged seems like the right thing to do. Youâ€™re always ready to go. But sitting in a fully charged state is very costly to a batteryâ€™s lifetime. Unintended chemical reactions occur more often in a fully charged battery, reducing its useful life. While itâ€™s not good for the battery to fill it 100% at all, itâ€™s much worse to keep it at 100% for a long period. As an example, if you store a battery 100% charged for one year at at 77 degrees F (25C), youâ€™ll permanently lose about 20% of its capacity, while if itâ€™s stored under the same conditions at only 40% filled, youâ€™ll only lose 4% of its capacity.
Most studies show that 40% is the optimal charge level for long-term battery storage, but youâ€™re pretty safe up to about 80%, and much better off at 90% than at 100%.
3. Donâ€™t empty them all the way
Batteries donâ€™t like to be empty. It reduces their capacity permanently if you discharge them to 0%. Itâ€™s much better to use the battery from 80% down to 30% twice than to discharge it from 100% to 0% once. Itâ€™s a little less harmful to the battery than overcharging, but both are harmful. An additional problem from over-discharged batteries is that the protection circuits that manage the battery for you donâ€™t have the power to operate. To get the most from your battery, keep it near the middle of its charge most of the time.
4. Donâ€™t get them too hot
Batteries are worn out by many uses, or by sitting around for years, but both of these are worse when the battery is hot. Getting a battery very hot will shorten its life, because the bad chemical reactions happen more at high temperatures. And while storing a battery at high temperatures is costly, using (charging or discharging) it at high temperatures is even worse. As an example, if you if you store a battery at a healthy 40% charge for a year at 77 degrees, youâ€™ll permanently lose 4% of its capacity, but if you store the same battery at 104 F (40 C), then youâ€™ll lose 15%.
So, donâ€™t keep your cellphone on a hot dashboard.
5. Donâ€™t get them too cold
Getting cold isnâ€™t as bad for a lithium-ion battery as getting hot, but it reduces the energy you can get out of it. If a battery is cold, it will empty more quickly. So a â€œcycleâ€ is less useful to you at low temperatures. One reason this is less of a concern than hot temperatures is that a battery will heat itself somewhat when discharging or charging, but you still have the problem until it heats up, and you lose capacity during that cold period.
Whatâ€™s the ideal temperature? A good guideline is that batteries like the same temperatures that people do. 70-75 degrees F is a great temperature range.
6. Donâ€™t charge or discharge them too quickly
Most of the guidelines above apply similarly to the different flavors of lithium-ion batteries, but the rate at which you can safely and efficiently charge/discharge your battery depends on which one you use. Some general principles apply, though: the faster you charge or discharge the battery, the more it degrades the batteryâ€™s lifetime, and the heat generated during charge/discharge can make the problem a lot worse if not actively cooled. Most batteries are unhappy if you discharge them at a rate that would take them from full to empty in less than 30 minutes, or if you charge them at a rate that would take them from empty to full in less than 60 minutes, but the slower the charge/discharge, the better. There is a LOT more detail on this topic (specific behavior of different chemistries, nano technology, etc.), but these simple principles always apply. If you need high discharge/charge rates, then choose a chemistry/battery type that can handle them (often called â€œpower optimizedâ€ battery types).
They’re like people
A good way to think of batteries is that theyâ€™re like people. We are happiest in 70-75 degree weather. We like to eat when weâ€™re just a little hungry (not starving), and we live a lot longer if we donâ€™t overeat. And stress shortens our lifetimes. If you treat batteries like you want to be treated yourself, then theyâ€™ll respond by being happy and productive for a long time.
Practically, managing your own battery is not very easy. Most chargers charge until a battery is full, and you have no control over where it stops. And when you disconnect the phone to avoid over-charging it, you start a discharge cycle that also affects your battery life. But in some products (most notably EVs, especially those from Tesla Motors and BMW) you have good control over how your battery is treated. Being familiar with these 6 simple principles will help you get the most out of the batteries that power your life.